February 2012

This comes from a Catholic church in South Carolina, where the Priest posted the following newsletter:

In response to this, I am obliged by my duty as your shepherd to make two observations:

Between these two visions of the use of lethal violence against the unborn there can be no negotiation or conciliation, and now our nation has chosen for its chief executive the most radical pro-abortion politician ever to serve in the United States Senate or to run for president. We must also take note of the fact that this election was effectively decided by the votes of self-described (but not practicing) Catholics, the majority of whom cast their ballots for President-elect Obama.

1. Voting for a pro-abortion politician when a plausible pro-life alternative exits constitutes material cooperation with intrinsic evil, and those Catholics who do so place themselves outside of the full communion of Christ’s Church and under the judgment of divine law. Persons in this condition should not receive Holy Communion until and unless they are reconciled to God in the Sacrament of Penance, lest they eat and drink their own condemnation.

2. Barack Obama, although we must always and everywhere disagree with him over abortion, has been duly elected the next President of the United States, and after he takes the Oath of Office next January 20th, he will hold legitimate authority in this nation. For this reason, we are obliged by Scriptural precept to pray for him and to cooperate with him whenever conscience does not bind us otherwise. Let us hope and pray that the responsibilities of the presidency and the grace of God will awaken in the conscience of this extraordinarily gifted man an awareness that the unholy slaughter of children in this nation is the greatest threat to the peace and security of the United States and constitutes a clear and present danger to the common good.

Father Newman

Did you catch all this? Especially: Voting for a pro-abortion politician when a plausible pro-life alternative exits constitutes material cooperation with intrinsic evil, and those Catholics who do so place themselves outside of the full communion of Christ’s Church and under the judgment of divine law.

So a Catholic priest is essentially using his church’s website to tell his parishioners that if you vote pro-Choice (aka Barack Obama and Democratic), you are cooperating with hell and are going to hell. Anyone want to check on this church’s tax exempt status?

Technorati Tags: abortion, obama, barack obama, democrats, voting for obama, divine law, judgment, judgement of god, jesus christ, catholic church, intrinsic evil, pro-choice, pro-choice candidates, politics

{ 7 comments }

The Article: GOP should ask why U.S. is on the wrong track by Ron Paul on CNN.

The Text: The questions now being asked are: Where to go from here and who’s to blame for the downfall of the Republican Party?

Too bad the concern for the future of the Republican Party had not been seriously addressed in the year 2000 when the Republicans gained control of the House, Senate, and the Presidency.

Now, in light of the election, many are asking: What is the future of the Republican Party?

But that is the wrong question. The proper question should be: Where is our country heading? There’s no doubt that a large majority of Americans believe we’re on the wrong track. That’s why the candidate demanding “change” won the election. It mattered not that the change offered was no change at all, only a change in the engineer of a runaway train.

Once it’s figured out what is fundamentally wrong with our political and economic system, solutions can be offered. If the Republican Party can grasp hold of the policy changes needed, then the party can be rebuilt.

In the rise and fall of the recent Republican reign of power these past decades, the goal of the party had grown to be only that of gaining and maintaining power — with total sacrifice of the original Republican belief in shrinking the size of government.

Most Republicans endorsed this view in order to achieve victories at the polls. Limiting government power and size with less spending and a balanced budget as the goal used to be a “traditional” Republican value. This is what Goldwater and Reagan talked about. That is what the Contract with America stood for.

The opportunity finally came in 2000 to do something about the cancerous growth of government. This clear message led to the Republican success at the polls.

Once the Republicans were in power, though, the promises faded, and all policies were directed at maintaining or increasing power by trying to whittle away at Democratic strength by acting like big-spending Democrats.

The Republican Congress never once stood up against the Bush/Rove machine that demanded support for unconstitutional wars, attacks on civil liberties here at home, and an economic policy based on more spending, more debt, and more inflation — while constantly preaching the flawed doctrine that deficits don’t matter as long as taxes aren’t raised.

But what the Republican leadership didn’t realize was that ALL spending is a tax on middle-class Americans through price inflation and that eventually the inevitable consequence is paying for the extravagance with a financial crisis.

Party leaders concentrated only on political tricks in order to maintain power and neglected the limited-government principles on which they were elected. The only solution for this is for Republicans to once again reassess their core beliefs and show how the country (not the party) can be put back on the right track. The problem, though, is regaining credibility.

After eight years of perpetual (and unnecessary and unconstitutional) war, persistent and expanded attacks on our privacy, runaway deficits, and now nationalization of the financial system, Republicans are going to have a tough time regaining the confidence of the American people. But that’s what must be done.

Otherwise, Republicans can only mimic Democrats and hope for an isolated victory here and there. And that’s just more of the same that brought on the disintegration of the party.

Since the new alignment of political power offers no real change, we will remain on the same track without even a pretense of slowing the growth of government. With the new administration we can expect things to go from bad to worse.

Opportunity abounds for anyone who can present the case for common sense in fiscal affairs, for protection of civil liberties here at home, and avoiding the senseless foreign entanglements which have bogged us down for decades and contributed so significantly to our fiscal and budgetary crisis.

During the debates in the Republican Presidential primary, even though I am a 10-term sitting Representative Member of Congress, I was challenged more than once on my Republican credentials. The fact that I was repeatedly asked how I could be a Republican when I was talking a different language than the other candidates answers the question of how the Republican Party can slip so far so fast.

My rhetorical answer at the time was simple: Why should one be excluded from the Republican Party for believing and always voting for:

• Limited government power

• A balanced budget

• Personal liberty

• Strict adherence to the Constitution

• Sound money

• A strong defense while avoiding all undeclared wars

• No nation-building and no policing the world

How can a party that still pretends to be the party of limited government distance itself outright from these views and expect to maintain credibility? Since the credibility of the Republican Party has now been lost, how can it regain credibility without embracing these views, or at least showing respect for them?

I concluded my answer by simply stating the Republican Party had lost its way and must reassess its values. And that is what needs to be done in a hurry.

But it might just take a new crop of leaders to regain the credibility needed to redirect the Party. It certainly won’t be done overnight. It took a long time to come out of the wilderness after 40 years of Democratic rule for the Republican Party to take charge. Today though, time moves more quickly. Opportunities will arise. The one thing for certain is that in the next four years we will not see the Republic restored. Instead the need for it will be greater than ever.

The problems are easily understood and the answers are not that difficult. Abusing the rule of law and ignoring the Constitution can be reversed. If the Republican Party can grasp hold of the needed reforms, it can lead the way and regain its credibility. If power is sought for power’s sake alone, the Party will never be able to wrench away the power of the opposition.

In the past two years, I found that when the young people heard the message of liberty, they overwhelmingly responded favorably, fully realizing the failure of the status quo and the need to once again endorse a system of self reliance, personal responsibility, sound money, and a non-interventionist foreign policy while rejecting the cradle-to-grave nanny state all based on the rule of law and the Constitution.

To ignore the political struggle and only “hope for the best” is pure folly. The march toward a dictatorial powerful state is now in double time.

All those who care — and especially those who understand the stakes involved — have an ominous responsibility to energetically get involved in the battle of survival for a free and prosperous America.

See Also: The GOP: Abusing the rule of law and ignoring the Constitution, The GOP is Open to Suggestions, There, there, Ron, Ron Paul, The Fed, Confederate Money, and Inflation, and The GOP opposition.

Technorati Tags: ron paul, state of the us economy, american economy, republican party, 2008 elections, 2008 campaign, future of republican party, small government, foreign policy, barack obama, united states, government

{ 1 comment }

Bill O’Reilly, Professional Hypocrite

by Video of the Day on November 11, 2008 |   Trackback URI   |     Email This Post Email This Post   |   90 Views  

“The meanness of the discourse in general bothers me.” Yah, Bill O’Reilly people.

See Also: Republican Post Election Hysteria, Greta argues with O’Reilly over that Carl Cameron ‘gossip’ on Sarah Palin, and ORLY O’REILLY?

Technorati Tags: cbs profile, bill o’reilly, meanness of the discourse, fox news, bill oreilly, interview, discourse, msnbc, keith olbermann, what the fuck

{ 2 comments }

Hey, Free Back Stabbing

by Political Ironing on November 11, 2008 |   Trackback URI   |     Email This Post Email This Post   |   30 Views  

lieberman Hey, Free Back Stabbing

See Also: Harry Reid Throws Joe Lieberman To The Wolves, My GOP Advice, Lieberman’s fate in the hands of the full caucus, Joe Lieberman is no Progressive, Lieberman Must Go Once and for All, “(D.) for Vendetta”, Reaching Across the Isle, What to do about Joe Lieberman?, Lieberman at the Fulcrum, A Time for Mercy, and Option Three For Lieberman.

Technorati Tags: joe liebermann, back stabber, joe lieberman, democrats, political cartoon, knife in the back, campaigning against democrats, campaigning against obama, campaigned for republicans, caucus, image, traitor

{ 0 comments }

The Best Analysis Of The Death Of The Republican Party

by Word Of The Day on November 10, 2008 |   Trackback URI   |     Email This Post Email This Post   |   259 Views  

Two of them, and they oddly come from typically more unforgivably conservative outlets. Mark Lilla writes The Perils of ‘Populist Chic’, a thorough repudiation of the Palin wing of the Republican elite. Check out this devastating commentary:

The Palin farce is already the stuff of legend. For a generation at least it is sure to keep presidential historians and late-night comedians in gainful employment, which is no small thing. But it would be a pity if laughter drowned out serious reflection about this bizarre episode. As Jane Mayer reported recently in the New Yorker (“The Insiders,” Oct. 27, 2008), John McCain’s choice was not a fluke, or a senior moment, or an act of desperation. It was the result of a long campaign by influential conservative intellectuals to find a young, populist leader to whom they might hitch their wagons in the future.

And not just any intellectuals. It was the editors of National Review and the Weekly Standard, magazines that present themselves as heirs to the sophisticated conservatism of William F. Buckley and the bookish seriousness of the New York neoconservatives. After the campaign for Sarah Palin, those intellectual traditions may now be pronounced officially dead.

And the second, I kid you not, from the Weekly Standard:

Republicans have a big problem. Nope, it’s not figuring out how to rebuild their party after consecutive defeats in national elections (that’s easy). Nor is it finding new leaders in Congress (also easy) or latching onto fresh ideas that might improve the Republican brand (easiest of all). The problem is simpler–but also more difficult–than those. It’s the tricky business of dealing with President Barack Obama.

For starters, Republicans should recognize their position in relation to Obama. For the time being anyway, he’s a colossus astride the continent, the most commanding political presence since Ronald Reagan arrived in Washington. He’s the star. Republicans are extras. If they attract attention, it’s likely to be because they’ve done something the media consider outrageous or dumb.

See Also: Sound Advice, New Leadership In Both Parties By February, How to lose a generation in six years, The Real Difference with 2004, Why We Do Not Need a Republican Party, Goodbye To All That, and History Doesn’t Always Repeat Itself.

Technorati Tags: republicans, direction of the republican party, where does the republican party go, populist chic, wall street journal, the weekly standard, republican party, direction for republicans, sarah palin, palin wing, conservative movement, conservatives after obamas election

{ 0 comments }

2008 Electoral Map By 18-29 Year Olds

by Political Ironing on November 10, 2008 |   Trackback URI   |     Email This Post Email This Post   |   234 Views  

2008electionbytheyouth 2008 Electoral Map By 18 29 Year Olds

See Also: Young Republicans Push Internet Organizing Priority, How much have voters really change?, Redrawing the Conservative Roadmap: Part I, Can Conservatism Regain Mainstream Support?, Political Wisdom: Obama’s Victory Has a Thousand Fathers, Exit Poll Demographics Shed Light on GOP’s Way Forward from Here, and For Once, Youth And Skill Defeat Old Age And Treachery.

Technorati Tags: youth vote, 18-29 year olds, barack obama, 2008 election, electoral map, electoral map drawn if only voting by 18-29 year olds, young people, young adults, 2008 campaign, john mccain, age demographics, vote by age, electoral college

{ 6 comments }

Argentina:

argentina1 Newspaper Headlines From Around The World After Obamas Election argentina2 Newspaper Headlines From Around The World After Obamas Election

Australia:

australia Newspaper Headlines From Around The World After Obamas Election

Belgium:

belgium Newspaper Headlines From Around The World After Obamas Election

Canada:

canada2 Newspaper Headlines From Around The World After Obamas Election canada1 Newspaper Headlines From Around The World After Obamas Election

China

china Newspaper Headlines From Around The World After Obamas Election

Czech Republic

czech Newspaper Headlines From Around The World After Obamas Election

El Salvador

elsalvador Newspaper Headlines From Around The World After Obamas Election

France

france1 Newspaper Headlines From Around The World After Obamas Election france2 Newspaper Headlines From Around The World After Obamas Election

Germany

germany1 Newspaper Headlines From Around The World After Obamas Election germany2 Newspaper Headlines From Around The World After Obamas Election

Guatemala

guatemala Newspaper Headlines From Around The World After Obamas Election

India

india1 Newspaper Headlines From Around The World After Obamas Election india2 Newspaper Headlines From Around The World After Obamas Election

Italy

italy1 Newspaper Headlines From Around The World After Obamas Election italy2 Newspaper Headlines From Around The World After Obamas Election

Lebanon

lebanon Newspaper Headlines From Around The World After Obamas Election

Philippines

philippines Newspaper Headlines From Around The World After Obamas Election

South Africa

southafrica Newspaper Headlines From Around The World After Obamas Election

United Kingdom

uk1 Newspaper Headlines From Around The World After Obamas Election uk2 Newspaper Headlines From Around The World After Obamas Election

Technorati Tags: newspapers from around the world following obama’s election, barack obama, american election, obamas election, reactions to obamas election, president of the united states, american election, newspaper reactions, newspaper headlines, frontpages, pictures, images, french newspapers, france, british newspapers, german newspapers, germany, italy, europe, asia, india, china

{ 2 comments }

Those People Are JERKS!!

by Video of the Day on November 8, 2008 |   Trackback URI   |     Email This Post Email This Post   |   23 Views  

By the way, what exactly was Sarah Palin running for — Vice President of the United States of America or treasurer of a special-ed fifth grade class? Judging by her inability to respond to criticism other than call her detractors ‘jerks’, I’m going with the latter.

See Also: The Conservative Intelligentsia And Palin, Rumor Patrol: Romney Camp Spreading Palin Stories?, Borowitz Scoop: Palin to be Ambassador to Africa, Africa Dumbatta, Palin calls attacks ‘cruel’ and ‘cowardly’, The GOP: Celebrating Ignorance, McCain/Palin Aide: Campaign Leaker “Twisting” Palin’s Words “Maliciously”, and Palin Fought Decisions Behind The Scenes.

Technorati Tags: sarah palin, jerks, sara palin video, borderline retarded, critics, detractors, mccain, mccain-palin infighting, mccain aids, mccain aides, republican party infighting, sarah palin interview, cnn, video clip, youtube

{ 1 comment }

Page 3 of 8123456...Last »