Write For ProseBeforeHos

by Administrator on March 27, 2011 |   Trackback URI   |     Email This Post Email This Post   |   534 Views  

Do you enjoy receiving money in exchange for goods and services? Well even if you don’t, you (yes, you!) should consider writing for ProseBeforeHos. We’re looking for writers on subjects as diverse as politics, international development/relations, culture, sports, and economics. You’ll be paid as handsomely as possible, have a large forum for others to read your content, and get to work with an up and coming website. To apply, send to pbhnetwork@gmail.com a writing sample and explain 1) why cultural/ethnic chauvinism is a significant barrier to social justice; or 2) why Bill Simmons is the worst sports writer alive.

Interested in writing but with a less serious bent? All That Is Interesting is also hiring content creators.

Share And Save
Other Posts On ProseBeforeHos You Might Like

Write For ProseBeforeHos
Write For The PBH Network’s New Website
A Call For Contributors
We Want Your Soul & Input
  • http://lacafechronicle.com(abouttogoofflineforimprovements) John Daniels

    I’m tempted to submit a writing sample, but I’d rather submit this idea if you’ve got the funding or the motivation to find it and run with the ball.
    Question: Why is it that we generally assume that a woman in a sexual assault case has somehow provoked the assault or is lying about the assault, particularly when the accused violator has more money (Think of Koby Bryant and the Recent head of the IMF guy)?
    Hypothesis: I believe that the woman in cases where the attacker financially out-weighs their opponent, are not discriminated against because they are women, but because of their socioeconomic disadvantage, or more specifically their perceived disadvantage.
    Further: I believe that race and gender or the perception of race and gender in relation to socioeconomic status has a deep impact on court cases, especially those in which there is lack of substantial evidence.
    what needs to be proved: First: that we the people have a perception of an individual’s class and status based on their race.
    Two: perception based on gender.
    Three: that we have a perception of an individual’s guilt or innocence based on their economic standing.
    If we believe that someone is innocent or guilty based on their economic strata and at the same time see race and gender as factors of judging someone’s economic status then it stands to reason that we rush to judgement when confronted with accusers and defenders of differing genders, race, and economic status and therefore taint the process of justice.

Previous post:

Next post: