Prose Before Hos Logo

A Bridge To Fundamental Town

Written By alec on September 30th, 2008  |   Trackback URI |   Email This Post Email This Post

Enjoy what you read? Subscribe to Prose Before Hos via email or via RSS feed.

See Also: “The Fundamentals Of Our Economy Are Strong”, Osama Bin Laden’s Dream of US Economic Collapse, Just A Nice Little Reminder, CNN Fact Checks McCain: Verdict He’s Not Telling Truth, Clueless Unreality at OH McCain Rally: “Greatest Job Growth Since WWII”?, John McCain: Economic Disaster, If At First You Don’t Succeed, ‘Impotent’ Bush’s feeble speech on the economic meltdown and bailout, and Destroying the Republican Party, and America.

Technorati Tags: , , , , , , , , , , ,

Share & Save:

DiggThis Share Share/Bookmark A Bridge To Fundamental Town

Related Posts on PBH

  • POW POW POW
  • Finally (?)
  • Just A Nice Little Reminder
  • John McCain Had To Give Lots Of Dome To Get In The Network
  • The McCain Campaign Is Melting
  • Like what you read? Subscribe to PBH by RSS or Email.

    Leave a comment on A Bridge To Fundamental Town:

    4 Comments

    • Thomas Jefferson

      Actually this problem has been created FROM TOO MUCH REGULATION.

      Comment | October 1, 2008
    • The economy is about greed and the only thing that has ever kept that in check is government regulation. Letting the foxes guard the hen house has never been a good idea or need we mention Lincoln Savings and Loan to John McCain.

      Comment | October 1, 2008
    • I think the current problem with the economy is more a long term reflection on trends towards redistributing wealth upwards rather than downwards. While we’ve seen the GDP grow [albeit inconsistently] the past 8 years, it hasn’t been shared, so we have a situation where the economy has grown but average income hasn’t.

      Secondly, what responsibility does the government have to bail out corporations? Yes, people and businesses need credit and rely on banks, but some sort of purge is necessary. These businesses failed and failed for a reason. Why prop up dying institutions when you already so heavily in debt?

      Comment | October 1, 2008
    • nikolai

      Alec said, “Why prop up dying institutions when you’re already so heavily in debt?”

      Indeed, and anyway, something I haven’t heard mentioned is that there are plenty of PROFITABLE, solid banks and brokerages which are doing business the right way who could at least take up part of the slack. If we are to “bailout” bad debt, why not let the failing banks stay failed, but hand over the bad debt to successful banks while lending them a hand in getting these bad mortgages back on track? Why reward a bad company’s bad behavior? Even if these failed banks and brokerage houses are bailed out, they SHOULD then belong to the U.S. taxpayers, who would be the rightful owners and who would eventually PROFIT from the bailout. Will any of this happen? NO. So the bailout plan as it stands should (again) be REJECTED.

      Comment | October 1, 2008