No “Change” In Obama’s Drone Doctrine
The Article: Don’t Look For “Change” In Obama’s Drone Doctrine by Savannah Cox in The Speckled Axe.
The Text: We see it in the headlines every day: Obama will be on the right side of history. In the social stratosphere, he righted himself recently via ācoming outā of his own moderate and pragmatic closet in favor of gay marriage (albeit at the state level). To justly associate himself with the ā99%ā majority, Obama aligned himself with aging plutocratic dissenter Warren Buffett while his wife Michelle sat next to Buffettās now-famous secretary at the State of the Union Address. Meanwhile, his fumbling attempt at affordable healthcareāone whose roots can easily be traced to the work of none other than presidential hopeful Mitt Romneyāawaits its fate this June. This is the hope and change that Shepard Fairey so colorfully promised back in 2008, right?
Not necessarily. Amid the flurry of Obamaās so-called ānovelā policies and plays on the political chess board, many of the same strategies of fact manipulation, deceit and political posturing spring eternal. No, heās not Bushāand thank God for that. But in terms of counter-terrorism, when the Obama administrationās strategies employ the same disregard for dehumanized civilians via drone strikes and the simultaneous generation of misleading nomenclature to soften the political blowback that would occur if, God forbid, Americans really knew how their tax dollars were being spent in the name of āfreedom,ā one has to wonder how different the two presidents actually are. Yes, weāre scheduled to exit Afghanistan and Iraq for good in the coming years, but when the administrationās drone war only emblazons the cause of the same groups against whom American troops fought extensively and expensively for nearly a decade, what have we really accomplished?





