Valerie Plame: Hot or not? Depends on your news source

by government_employee on March 23, 2007 |   Trackback URI   |     Email This Post Email This Post   |   148 Views  

Last week we had the pleasure of seeing Valerie Plame testify in front of a congressional hearing to discuss the situation and aftermath of being exposed in retaliation of her husband’s critical piece about enriched uranium. Of course, coverage varies — from CNN putting the story on the front page of their website, to Fox News merily having a video on the side of the site — but the most interesting variations were seen in the pictures used on the various media outlets:

CNN (mmmm soo hot, you seducing me Ms. Plame????)

cnn1 Valerie Plame: Hot or not? Depends on your news source
Click for the bigger CNN picture

Fox News (hey, where’d the make up and Mrs. Robinson look go?!)

foxnews Valerie Plame: Hot or not? Depends on your news source foxnews2 Valerie Plame: Hot or not? Depends on your news source
Click here for the bigger Fox News picture

MSNBC (good looking but not boner enducing like in CNN)

msnbc Valerie Plame: Hot or not? Depends on your news source
msnbc2 Valerie Plame: Hot or not? Depends on your news source
Click here for MSNBC big picture 1 and MSNBC big picture 2

AOL News (Wombat lady!!! Aghhhh!)

aol Valerie Plame: Hot or not? Depends on your news source

All in all, it’s what we’d expect: on CNN, Valerie Plame is a sexual freak who I want to enrich my uranium all over; on MSNBC, she is as neutral as Keith Olbermann’s non-offensive PC haircut; on Fox News, she is an angry liberal scorpion; and inexplicably on AOL, she is medusa reincarnate.


In other news…

The source of american problems at home

BREAKING NEWS! TURKEY INVADES IRAQ!

Fox News Admits Doing PR For The Tea Parties

Leave a Comment

{ 7 comments… read them below or add one }

Ron March 23, 2007 at 5:05 PM

Great stuff. Well done

(By the way, great blog name!)

–Ron

http://revolttoday.blogspot.com/

Reply

tonymac March 23, 2007 at 8:40 PM

she’s a knockout — compare her to that Coulter skank from New Canaan

Reply

greg March 23, 2007 at 9:16 PM

The prize has to go to Good Morning America(iirc) which referred to her testimony as “The most compelling testimony on the Hill since Fawn Hall” !! (Ollie North’s secretary.). My feeling is, focusing on her hot-or-notness is just another case of the Shiny Object Theory; it steals column inches and TV seconds from the content of her testimony.

Reply

ProseCameInSecond March 23, 2007 at 11:05 PM

“in lue of” (spelled lieu) means “instead of, in place of”, you probably meant “due to” or “because of”… better still “in retaliation for”….

Reply

alec March 23, 2007 at 11:21 PM

Good call. This was written rather quick and without a second edit.

Reply

Kit March 23, 2007 at 11:51 PM

quick should be quickly, Einstein

Reply

alec March 24, 2007 at 8:08 AM

Words are like bullets, I just let them pass through me

Reply

Previous post:

Next post: