Which Makes More Sense?

by Political Ironing on March 4, 2012 |   Trackback URI   |     Email This Post Email This Post   |   13554 Views  

Makes More Sense

Exorbitant amounts of greed versus scientific concern. Guess which side is currently winning.


Common Sense (it just took a while)

I am Man

Las Vegas Slots Versus Electronic Voting Machines

Who would win a fight?
  • http://pornhub.com Science Rules

    I don’t think either one of those is true, it doesn’t have to be one or the other. I think both sides stretch the truth in their favor. One does not want change and will lie to keep business as usual. And the other wants change sooo much that they will skew the truth to get what they want as well.
    This is just another great example of conflicting interests.

    • Luzilla66

      For what purpose? What do environmentalists have to gain by exaggerating about climate change? Im quite sure no climate change activists are profiting from this movement. The only reason I can see for their exaggeration that logically makes sense is simply to gain more support for their cause, albeit on questionably hyperbolic pretenses. Even so, their intentions seems quite a big more honorable than Oil Company’s motivation for profits. Oil companies not only have much more to gain, but also much more to lose. Conflicting interests seems to be an inappropriate way to describe this situation. More like interests being compromised by legislation.

      • fart

         You don’t think climate change activists are profiting? How about the millions/billions of dollars in research grants and green energy subsidies that governments are spending?

  • J6

    you can see the bias in the second slide… “limited” operating budgets? Both groups have been making “obscene profits”. In case you haven’t noticed…being green is kind of a big thing now; but hey, you can live in the past if you want

    • Sam

       how much of a profit is being gained by being green? how much of a thing is it, in comparison to the blanket term used above, “big oil companies?”

  • http://profile.yahoo.com/722K4F4QALNE45GHYKFMB4HE2I davidk

    I laugh my butt off when i read this. It’s not about the planet it’s about politic. Al Gore has gotten very rich over this global warning idea and so have a lot of others. Maybe it is warming but is it us causing it or just a normal climatic change that we go through ever few  hundred or thousand years? Has not been that long since the little ice age ( a couple of hundred years ago?).   90% of the scientist my *ss. Where do you come up with that number ?   But you believe what you want as it’s your right. What is really sad and scary is we can’t talk about it like we use to other things as your are a nut if you do not believe like what ever side you are on about global warming . NOTHING  in science is ever absolute, because we have been so sure so many times that our side was right just to find out later we were wrong.

  • ben_b

    Who benefits? The government benefits.  They get expanded powers and thus have a reason to scare people with the global warming bogey man. 

Previous post:

Next post: