Via Mad Atoms: What Your Opposition To Gay Marriage Really Means
Technorati Tags: gay marriage, real meaning, closet homosexuals, christianity, bible thumpers, real reasons for gay marriage opposition, civil unions, infograph, humor
 Our Marriage Was Once Illegal Too |  Dick Cheney Is More Progressive Than Barack Obama | Temporary Marriage and Sex and Society in the Muslim World |  Real Jesus Versus Republican Jesus |
Explore the PBH Network! More funny, faster.
{ 8 comments… read them below or add one }
The animal reason was a cheap way to ignore what the slipper slope ACTUALLY leads to. If you are pro gay marriage than you should be giving polygamy and marraige between direct family members the same support. The fact is, proponents of polygamy and incest will jump on this same campaign (obviously between consenting adults).
Not reasonable. “Neither is any kind of oral sex.” number one makes very little sense and number two is not a reason why anyone is wrong it’s just a fact you’re giving out. You have a flawed system, sure it’s funny, but it’s quite flawed and would never hold up in any kind of argument.
the reason living organisms are hard wired to enjoy sex is because it procreates and continues the species and bloodlines. oral sex is tricking the brain into thinking you have just made a baby when you haven’t. so no, it actually isn’t natural.
but that doesn’t make it any less awesome
By that logic, masturbation isn’t natural. Also, oral sex has been documented in several other species: http://www.plosone.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0007595
Is it me or is he calling the opposition to gay marriage gay? Does this actually help the cause at all? It’s like calling a slave owner black, or does this reasoning not help my case?
i don’t think he’s using the word gay as an insult, he’s just implying that he thinks that homo phobics feel that way as a result of their own suppressed homosexuality
Umm… clearly whoever made this didn’t truly read the bible either…. otherwise they would know the difference between New and Old Testament and therefore their argument is invalid.
Yes in the OLD Testament they stoned adulterers and the like. However, with the death and resurrection of Jesus Christ that route is no longer necessary nor is it human responsibility..
Face it… if you’re gay/lesbian and a believer you will have to answer for that lifelong sin to the ONLY being that can and will judge you (that’s God in case I’m unclear)… if you’re not a believer you’re going to hell anyway so don’t worry about it, I guess…
The parts against gay sex in the new testament are pretty weak. Leviticus is much stronger – Jesus died so that gay sex would be ok.
{ 2 trackbacks }