{"id":7193,"date":"2011-06-06T23:43:41","date_gmt":"2011-06-07T03:43:41","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.prosebeforehos.com\/?p=7193"},"modified":"2012-12-26T20:59:11","modified_gmt":"2012-12-27T01:59:11","slug":"the-five-major-accomplishments-of-the-tea-party","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.prosebeforehos.com\/government_employee\/06\/06\/the-five-major-accomplishments-of-the-tea-party\/","title":{"rendered":"The Five Major Accomplishments Of The Tea Party"},"content":{"rendered":"

On the bloody battlefields of World War II, soldiers would refer to a confusing, messy, and all-out hopeless situation as a “clusterfuck<\/a>“. It is perhaps appropriate then that this word has become the most apt in describing modern American politics\u2014the only difference is the House of Representatives doesn\u2019t get as bloody as we might like it to<\/del>. So it was something of a relief when the Tea Party showed up. <\/p>\n

Regardless of one\u2019s political affiliations, at least here was a pure, grass roots (cough<\/a>) manifestation of the people\u2019s frustration at their cynical, self-serving representatives. For a while leading up to the 2010 midterm elections, it seemed as if something akin to a third political party had finally emerged in American politics. Of course, everyone regarded this as more of a schism in the Republican Party<\/a> than a legitimate uprising, but actions speak louder than Reuters\u2019 polls, so why don\u2019t we look at what the improbably-elected “Tea Party Candidates” have managed to accomplish.<\/p>\n

Accomplishment Number One: Nothing. (No, Seriously).<\/strong><\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

It\u2019s astounding how similar the Tea Party revolution is to the phenomenon of Republican schizophrenia manifesting as inaction. But if you\u2019re a politician who rode to prominence on the back of a mantra of “as little government as possible and probably even less than that” this is actually quite a victory. In the past decade, the US government has begun one of the most expensive and protracted military campaigns in recent history, spent billions under both Democrats<\/a> and Republicans<\/a> to fund healthcare, both parties have signed off on sweeping encroachments of civil liberties<\/a>, and the Supreme Court recently decided the sound of a toilet flushing<\/a> is just cause for cops to search your house.<\/p>\n

If you\u2019re a normal, jaded person who thinks our politicians are less evil, conniving masterminds, and more greedy, incompetent or blindly ideological, this phenomenon has a pretty logical explanation: In an environment where you have to prove to an incredibly fickle and vindictive boss (i.e. the American People) that you\u2019re doing your job well, it\u2019s easier to pass some ham-fisted legislation than argue the sociological, economic, and, not to mention, Constitutional implications of legislation. You just want to have the shiniest gold star come Election Day, even if it\u2019s built on the corpses of citizens\u2019 privacies or Iraqi civilians. Granted there are still a multitude of problems out there that the government is uniquely suited to ameliorate, but viewed in the context of the past decade maybe the American government could afford to take five.<\/p>\n

Maybe we can all take the possible impending government shut down<\/a> as a breather and calmly discuss the nuances of some of our more intractable social ills right guys? \u2026 guys? <\/p>\n

Accomplishment Number Two: Increasing Government Power<\/strong><\/p>\n

\"Tea<\/p>\n

Of the many baffling<\/a> political mantras<\/a> that have been bandied about recently, one that still rings true was uttered by Lord Acton more than a century ago: “Power tends to corrupt, and absolute power corrupts absolutely. Great men are almost always bad men.” So it should come as no surprise that\u2014after an election season of blood-curdling screams to keep the government out of everything\u2014members of both parties, and several prominent Tea Party politicians, sat down and quietly voted to renew the Patriot Act<\/a>. <\/p>\n

Accomplishment Number Three: Pressuring Republicans to do Some Crazy and Not-So-Crazy Things<\/strong><\/p>\n

As much as Democrats get pigeon-holed as tax-and-spend libertines and Republicans get cast as war-mongering budget-be-damned-let\u2019s-bomb-that-country, let\u2019s be honest for a second: neither party is serious<\/a> about reducing the budget deficit. Neither party will touch entitlements, Republicans think everything can be solved with tax cuts, Democrats think everything can be solved by taxing the rich, and Libertarians are off in some fantasy land where you can slash Medicare and still get elected. But the heavily Tea Party-influenced Paul Ryan budget (as flawed as it was<\/a>) was one of the first serious moves to address the astronomical growth in Medicare in decades, and it would have never come about without the libertarian shift the Tea Party has brought to the Republican Party.<\/p>\n

That\u2019s enough of the sanity, let\u2019s get to the crazy: the Tea Party is one of the biggest Republican constituencies<\/a> behind the move to not raise the debt ceiling. There is an argument that not raising the debt ceiling will force Washington to get serious about getting the federal budget under control. The people that argue this have apparently never bothered to talk to a single economist or anyone in the financial industry. The truth is, as politically attractive as this option sounds, it is difficult to express how absolutely catastrophic it would be for the American, and the world, economy. In a word: America”>declares bankruptcy<\/a>. It\u2019s so bad that the mere possibility caused even the soulless heads of Wall Street banks to find God. As Jamie Dimon, head of JP Morgan, put it in the above link: “We\u2019re praying”.<\/p>\n

Accomplishment Number Four: Accomplished the Impossible: Made Both Democrats and Republicans Happy<\/strong><\/p>\n

While it seems that no compromise is good enough to fly in the hyper-partisan world of American politics these days, it\u2019s worth noting that at least both sides of the aisle agree on one thing: the Tea Party has been great for business<\/a>. <\/p>\n

To put it mildly, in 2008 Republicans were suffering from something of an image problem. They were viewed as having started an expensive, unnecessary war and also there was something about the global economy collapsing to a degree not seen for almost a century (though to be fair, that was kind of everyone\u2019s fault<\/a>). To Republican analysts, the Tea Party was a much-needed rebranding that energized the base and allowed them to comfortably disown all that pesky deficit growing<\/a> they did in the Aughts.<\/p>\n

In 2010, Democrats were suffering from the “honeymoon is over we need to decide who takes out the garbage” phase of election cycles. Hope and Change have this annoying semantic quality that they\u2019re incredibly useless once you actually have to solve legislative problems. But then the Tea Party came along, and they got the chance to have yet another Hope and Change hater to demonize. Not only that, but (depending on which analyst you ask) the Tea Party prevented the inevitable midterm incumbent backlash from overtaking the Senate by nominating candidates who disliked down-home American values like Baseball, Apple Pie, and, of course, Reality<\/a>. <\/p>\n

Accomplishment Number Five: Being Amusingly Insane<\/strong><\/p>\n