February 2012

“N”-Word Banned in NYC

by anonymous_banker on February 28, 2007 |   Trackback URI   |     Email This Post Email This Post   |   177 Views  

It’s a sad day for many of us here at PBH as we learn that today, New York City, has banned the use of one of my and many of my associates favorite words: The “N”-word. I’ll spell it out in case you haven’t heard this particular euphemism: nigger. I’ll define from the urban dictionary below:

A word that everyone else is afraid to define except in utter seriousness, for fear of being branded a rascist[sic], in total ignorance of the colloquial usage of the word, its characterization in popular culture, and the populations of people it is used most by.

Urban Dictionary: Nigger

17 popper nigger.thumbnail N Word Banned in NYC

This ruling is actually quite interesting for two reasons..

  1. This is probably the first time in history that a WORD has been outlawed.
  2. There’s no actual penalty for using the word, thus, the rule is pointless. But I’m sure our astute readers already figured that out

Anyway, since the “N”-word has apparently been banned for casual conduct, We’ve got a great plan here. Since this was announced today, we’ll mark each and every March 1st as Nigger Day! Kool-Aid and Watermelon for all!!!

Racial Slur Banned in New York

[UPDATE] It turns out that we’ve just finished Black History month… Nigger Day! What a great way to finish that one off and get onto real biz!

{ 43 comments }

Who’s going to pay my monthly rape bill?

by Word Of The Day on February 28, 2007 |   Trackback URI   |     Email This Post Email This Post   |   414 Views  

Courtesy of Girl Farts (which I can only assume is a site run by an Asian man whose fetish is to stick his nose into a women’s buttcrack after a hearty meal of barbecue and semen), it’s been reported that “rape victims in Missouri are billed for their rape kits“. Now, you see, some people may misconstrue this as some horrible measure in a podunk, antiquated state. But in reality, this is a continuation of the Thomas Jefferson business policies (TJ biz-nass for all you ebonics linguists), for it is the secret clause in the US Constitution that reads “Thou shalt do ladies against thy will, and when thee pregnancy emerges, they shalt be the one to pay for it. When thy is confronted with said charges, please ignorance, heavily and mightily, and when unsurmountable evidence falls out of your favor, publicly state “She asked for it”. Thus, thou shalt be ridden of thy burden”. America people, learn to love it.

{ 2 comments }

What if you gave a blowjob party but nobody came?

by Article of the Day on February 28, 2007 |   Trackback URI   |     Email This Post Email This Post   |   938 Views  

The Article: Are You There God? It’s Me, Monica (How nice girls got so casual about oral sex) by Caitlin Flanagan of the Atlantic.

Choice Bits (and I’ve never heard Jewish oral sex discussed so deeply):

The first time I heard a mother of girls talk about the teenage oral-sex craze, I made her cry. The story she told me—about a bar mitzvah dinner dance on the North Shore of Chicago, where the girls serviced all the boys on the chartered bus from the temple to the reception hall—was so preposterous that I burst out laughing. The thought of thirteen-year-old girls in party dresses performing a sex act once considered the province of prostitutes (we are talking here about the on-your-knees variety given to a series of near strangers) was so ludicrous that all I could do was giggle.

The moms in my set are convinced—they’re certain; they know for a fact—that all over the city, in the very best schools, in the nicest families, in the leafiest neighborhoods, twelve- and thirteen-year-old girls are performing oral sex on as many boys as they can. They’re ducking into janitors’ closets between classes to do it; they’re doing it on school buses, and in bathrooms, libraries, and stairwells. They’re making bar mitzvah presents of the act, and performing it at “train parties”: boys lined up on one side of the room, girls working their way down the row. The circle jerk of old—shivering Boy Scouts huddled together in the forest primeval, desperately trying to spank out the first few drops of their own manhood—has apparently moved indoors, and now (death knell of the Eagle Scout?) there’s a bevy of willing girls to do the work.
Advertisement

When I first began hearing these stories, I was convinced that we were in the grips of a nationwide urban legend, and the prevalence of stories centered on bar mitzvahs seemed to me suspicious, possibly even anti-Semitic in origin. But sure enough, in 2003 a feminist Jewish quarterly called Lilith addressed the story—not to debunk it but to come to terms with it as a recognized problem within the Jewish community: “No one is suggesting, even for a moment, that Jewish teens are leading the oral sex revolution. But they may have earlier and more frequent opportunities for sexual contact in a supercharged social milieu than their non-Jewish peers.” The authors observe that the oral sex is “almost always unilateral (girls on boys).”

… Somehow these girls have developed the indifferent attitude toward performing oral sex that one would associate with bitter, long-married women or streetwalkers. But they think of themselves as normal teenagers, version 2005. For a while, whenever I passed groups of young girls, I looked at them anew. Were these nice kids—the ones playing AYSO soccer and doing their homework and shopping with their moms—behaving like little whores whenever they got the chance? It was like some weird search for communists—was the sweet, well-spoken daughter of a friend actually a blowjobber? I looked at the small girls in my children’s schoolyard—as cosseted and protected and beloved a group of children as you will find anywhere on the planet—and tried to convince myself that in a matter of five or six years they would be performing oral sex on virtual strangers.

he Rainbow Party, an offering from Simon Pulse, a young-adult division of Simon & Schuster, takes place on a single day, in which a tough little sophomore named Gin issues invitations to a party at which she and five of her friends will perform oral sex on the lucky guests, a group of popular boys. The girls will each wear a different color of lipstick, so that when a boy has completed the circuit, his penis will bear the colors of the rainbow. The party is to take place after school, to last about an hour and a half—including time for chitchat—and to conclude before Gin’s father returns home from work.

In addition to the predictable, outraged criticism that this vile book has received, there is a question of veracity: as many readers have noted, wouldn’t the different colors of lipstick smear together, destroying the desired rainbow effect? Not once, however, has another question been posed: How many boys could successfully receive seven blowjobs in an hour? Surely even the adolescent male at the peak of his sexual prime needs at least a few minutes to reload. One would assume that the first transaction would be completed at light speed, that the second might take a bit longer—and that by the fourth or fifth even the horniest tenth-grader might display some real staying power. But asking questions like these will automatically preclude you from entering the current oral-sex hysteria, which presupposes not only that a limitless number of young American girls have taken on the sexual practices of porn queens but also that American boys are capable of having an infinite number of sexual experiences in rapid succession. It requires believing that a boy could be serviced at the school-bus train party—receiving oral sex from ten or fifteen girls, one after another—and then zip his fly and head off to homeroom, first stopping in the stairwell for a quickie to tide him over until math.

Why it’s important: If you weren’t lucky enough to be bestowed with “back in my day, a liver pie cost 5 cents and you’d still have enough change afterwards to sleep with a fat prostitute in Harlem”, here’s your chance. Nothing says old or out of touch then an old and out of touch person writing about generational differences. *GASP!* Younger people think about subjects and act in different ways (*GASP!*) including sex then their elders do! To the Batmobile, Sherlock Fucking Holmes.

Analysis: Thank god for this article and the reasoning behind it. It makes my day when I can peruse one of my favorite periodicals to hear the logical fallacy behind rainbow parties: “How many boys could successfully receive seven blowjobs in an hour? Surely even the adolescent male at the peak of his sexual prime needs at least a few minutes to reload.” I suggest to Ms. Flanagan the ever popular bukkake film, which will show her first hand the idea that ‘sharing is caring’. And by caring, I mean smearing a male humans protein strands all over a females face. Mmm mmm mmm, love at first sight. The point and summary is simple: blowjobs rule, blowjobs make you popular, and every girl between 13 and 18 are giving them out for free. I’ll see you, dear reader, at the nearest high school parking lot.

{ 6 comments }

Hurry up and kill yourself! For +10 EMO Points!

by anonymous_banker on February 27, 2007 |   Trackback URI   |     Email This Post Email This Post   |   667 Views  

Technorati Tags: emo kids, emo point system, local broadcast, how to tell if you are emo or not, idiot adults, news program, news segment, television show, video clip, emos, what is an emo, emo points

{ 108 comments }

Good Reads

by Link of the Day on February 27, 2007 |   Trackback URI   |     Email This Post Email This Post   |   0 Views  

OTIzOA%3D%3D cmVjZW50cmV2aWV3cw%3D%3D 5db767e404d81fec1152ebce4f6e9a043a1e6a53 Good Reads

Shameless plug for another site, but it has to be done (so join!!):

Checkout my reading list on Goodreads – where you can see what your friends are reading.

http://www.goodreads.com/

{ 0 comments }

So hot right now

by Kit on February 27, 2007 |   Trackback URI   |     Email This Post Email This Post   |   1 Views  

alex ross So hot right now

{ 2 comments }

Aww… How cute!

by anonymous_banker on February 26, 2007 |   Trackback URI   |     Email This Post Email This Post   |   7 Views  

We woke up to a few inches of the white stuff this morning… as the precip ended, the cleanup crews started to scour the neighborhood for a walk and driveway they could shovel for a few bucks.

I did our cleanup (we own a snowblower), but we have our own crew of workmen working on our garage today.

As usual, my racist dog growled at the black men shoveling for a buck, while she licked the hands of the white repairmen at our door. While we’re not a perfect family, we have managed to train the dog well!

{ 0 comments }

A Case of Mistaken Identity

by alec on February 25, 2007 |   Trackback URI   |     Email This Post Email This Post   |   22 Views  

In light of Facebook disabling my account for using an alias, I had to switch my account to my real name — Alec Baldwin! This has meant new “who are you” messages, but in a recent development, one of the odder messages I’ve ever received:

Um, if you’re thee A.B., then I have something to say: As a Lobbyist for a conservative thinktank in Washington, DC, your personal passion for all things unpatriotic and unAmerican is the biggest turnoff to me…and I want to dislike you…BUT…you are such a talented actor…not to mention a very, VERY sexy man…that I cannot help but hate to love you. Thank you for making my Thursday nights on 30 Rock, baby. Please, just stop the political rants–as ignorance is not your best feature–however, your eyes, hair, smile and quick witted banter are….just abosolutely sublime.

So, may I be your token conservative friend?

If this is not thee A.B.– get a life and claim it as your own. There’s simply no need to pretend you are a misguided liberal with brilliant, comedic timing.

The self-described uber-conservative and culture-warrior turned actor-stalker is Julie Neff, a Liberty University graduate and a lobbyist for CWA (Concerned Women for America). The CWA is an organization that helps “people focus on six core issues, which we have determined need Biblical principles most and where we can have the greatest impact. At its root, each of these issues is a battle over worldviews.” Biblical inspiration, of course, amounts to preventing homosexuals from having civil rights, making sure abortions are only available to minorities and infidels, and encoding all of their video samples into an unheard of and unplayable Windows Media format. Oh, and also railing against network broadcast shows for talking about getting laid and other perverted things that baby Jesus doesn’t approve of and forewarning girls about the ‘transformation zone’, aka the vagina (what the fuck is a transformation zone??).

The point is that the internet is weird and is now being populated with Christians, even though the Bible strictly forbids science, technology, and other forms of wizardry. With that being said, get your heathen ass over to facebook and add me as a friend:

1514249.508.1674021033 A Case of Mistaken Identity

{ 5 comments }

Page 1 of 512345