Prose Before Hos Logo

These are the Spineless Democrats You Elected

Written By alec on September 20th, 2007  |   Trackback URI |   Email This Post Email This Post

Today, the Senate voted for a measure to censure the MoveOn.org General Betray Us ad in the New York Times, 72-25. So much for winning the majority, right Democrats? A year later, we’re still knee-deep in this piece of shit war and the most legislation that can get passed is for censoring a group for FREEDOM OF SPEECH. Anyway, you have these 21 Democrats to thank for this wonderful waste of time:

Baucus (D-MT)
Bayh (D-IN)
Cardin (D-MD)
Carper (D-DE)
Casey (D-PA)
Conrad (D-ND)
Dorgan (D-ND)
Feinstein (D-CA)
Johnson (D-SD)
Klobuchar (D-MN)
Kohl (D-WI)
Landrieu (D-LA)
Leahy (D-VT)
Lincoln (D-AR)
McCaskill (D-MO)
Mikulski (D-MD)
Nelson (D-FL)
Nelson (D-NE)
Pryor (D-AR)
Salazar (D-CO)
Tester (D-MT)
Webb (D-VA)

Share & Save:

DiggThis Share Share/Bookmark These are the Spineless Democrats You Elected

Related Posts on PBH

  • My deepest desires, performed on national television
  • Addendum: Fuck Harry Reid and the Senate Democrats
  • The Kind of Democrats We Should Be Supporting
  • British People Are Stupid Too
  • Just One More Day For Joe
  • Like what you read? Subscribe to PBH by RSS or Email.

    Leave a comment on These are the Spineless Democrats You Elected:

    1 Comment

    • http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d110:HR1585:

      and just to make your day even more juicy. The censure was an amendment to a war spending bill. Talk about dirty fucking scum underhanded actions. It is cowardly and unamerican to bring forward a criticism of political dissent tied to a spending bill that goes directly to the war.

      This is nothing more than a continuation of bullshit business as usual but now it’s being supported by low life embarrassments that were brought into office specifically to eliminate this war and bring decency back to American ideals.\

      Democrat or Republican, I call treason on any senator that supported this censure against free speech.

      Comment | September 20, 2007