The Kind of Democrats We Should Be Supporting

“If the United States leads the charge to war in the Persian Gulf, we may get lucky and achieve a rapid victory. But then we will face a second war: a war to win the peace in Iraq. This war will last many years and will surely cost hundreds of billions of dollars. In light of this enormous task, it would be a great mistake to expect that this will be a replay of the 1991 war. The stakes are much higher in this conflict…. Today I weep for my country. I have watched the events of recent months with a heavy, heavy heart. No more is the image of America one of strong, yet benevolent peacekeeper. The image of America has changed. Around the globe, our friends mistrust us, our word is disputed, our intentions are questioned. Instead of reasoning with those with whom we disagree, we demand obedience or threaten recrimination.”

See Also: Fear 1, Dems 0, Torture Appropriations, Was George Bush on a Mission From God in Iraq?, Keep Bombing Until They See Things Our Way, The main concern of Washington, Every once in awhile I do need reminding that my party sucks, too, Keeping Us Safe, Blaming National Security Conservatives for Republican Problems, Pelosi and the Democrats knew and supported the use of Bush’s torture all along, and What, Eight Years Wasn’t Long Enough?

Email

0
From The PBH NetworkHot On The Web
  1. Robert Byrd may have been right about this issue, but he’s hardly a progressive democrat we should be supporting. The man lands more earmarks for his state per capita than any other man in the Senate. This guy feeds off the federal government and throws a hissy-fit anytime someone tries to cut some pork that was headed his way or exposes one of his many questionable ties to lobbyists. Even West Virginians who hate most of his political views still vote for him because he can pretty much take what he wants from the federal government and funnel it to West Virginia.

Hot On The Web